WPClientFeedback vs Feedbucket
Feedbucket is a well-liked feedback widget built for web agencies — screenshot and video capture, a clean review flow, no client logins. WPClientFeedback shares the audience and the no-client-logins philosophy, and differs on architecture and pricing. Facts and prices below reflect Feedbucket's public site as of July 2026; check their pricing page for current numbers.
At a glance
| WPClientFeedback | Feedbucket | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Self-hosted WordPress plugin | SaaS; WP plugin loads their widget script |
| Where feedback data lives | Your WordPress database | Feedbucket's cloud |
| Pricing (July 2026) | Flat annual: $79 / $149 / $249 per year | Pro $39/mo annual (2 team members, 5 active projects); Business $72/mo annual (25 members, unlimited projects) |
| Free version | Full internal review tool, unlimited users | 14-day trial, no free plan |
| Team member limits | None on any tier | 2 at Pro, 25 at Business |
| Active project limits | None | 5 at Pro, unlimited at Business |
| Remove vendor branding | White label included in Pro | Business tier and up |
| Clients comment without accounts | Yes (Pro review links, one labeled link per reviewer) | Yes (guest reporters) |
| Screenshot / video capture | No — pins live on the real page, no screenshots needed | Yes, including screen recordings |
| Block editor integration | Pins on Gutenberg blocks, badges + sidebar in the editor | None |
| Works beyond WordPress | No | Yes |
What Feedbucket does well
Feedbucket's capture experience is genuinely nice: reporters can annotate screenshots or record their screen, and submissions carry technical context automatically. It sends feedback to project tools agencies already use, and it works on any website, not just WordPress. Unlimited guest reporters on every plan.
Where WPClientFeedback is different
1. The pin is the page, not a picture of it. Feedbucket annotates screenshots of the moment feedback was given. WPClientFeedback pins the live Gutenberg block — the thread stays attached as the page evolves, shows up badged inside the block editor, and follows the block through reorders, rewrites, and revisions. When the block is deleted, the thread waits in an Unattached comments tray. On a site under active revision, feedback that tracks the content beats feedback that remembers a screenshot.
2. Self-hosted, by design. Feedback about your client's unlaunched site is client data. Feedbucket holds it in their cloud; WPClientFeedback keeps it in the site's own database, with export, snapshots, and clean uninstall built in.
3. Flat license against capped tiers. Feedbucket's Pro plan is $39/mo billed annually — about $468 a year — for 2 team members and 5 active projects, with their branding on the widget until you move to Business at $72/mo. WPClientFeedback Pro has no member or project caps on any tier, includes white label, and the unlimited-sites license is $249/yr. An agency's busy season costs the same as its slow one.
Who should pick which
Pick Feedbucket if: you review sites across many platforms, and screenshot or screen-recording capture is central to how your reporters communicate.
Pick WPClientFeedback if: your work is WordPress, you want feedback anchored to real content and visible in the editor, you'd rather clients review the live page than a screenshot, and flat pricing fits how you run the agency.
Download free plugin — See pricing
Comparing other tools? See vs Atarim, vs SureFeedback, and vs BugHerd.